River
Y CombinatorBacked by Y Combinator
FREE TEMPLATE

Legal Motion and Brief Template

Five documents and three sheets that keep the relief you noticed, the relief you argued and the relief the order grants as one answer.

Free download  ·  No account needed

Relief Register

[Matter]  ·  [the motion]

One row per form of relief. Five columns, five documents, and a gap in any of them is a defect in the filing rather than in the writing.

Relief soughtAuthorised byNoticedArguedEvidenceIn the order
[the first thing you want][rule]Yes§[n][decl.] ¶[n]¶[n]
[the second thing][rule]No§[n][decl.] ¶[n]¶[n]
[the third thing][rule]YesNowhereNone¶[n]

Rows two and three are the two failures nobody proofreads for

Row two argues for relief the notice never asked for. Row three puts relief in the proposed order that no section of the memorandum supports and no declaration evidences. Both read perfectly inside their own document and neither survives being read across all four.

Every bracket fills from your own motion. Nothing here ships with a form of relief already in it.

A request for a court order is made by motion, and the rule puts two obligations on that motion: state the grounds with particularity, and state the relief sought. Neither obligation belongs to the memorandum. California says the same thing about the notice, which has to state the nature of the order being sought and the grounds for issuance in its opening paragraph. So the argument you spent three days on satisfies neither requirement on its own.

The arithmetic in the page limit proves the separation. California's memorandum rule excludes the notice of motion and motion, the declarations, the exhibits, the tables and the proof of service from the count, which is a list of everything else the filing consists of. A legal brief template gives you one of them. This pack builds the set and holds them to each other, because a filing fails at the joins rather than inside any single document.

The relief is the spine. Each form of relief carries the rule that authorises it, the ground stated for it in the notice, the section arguing it, the declaration paragraph proving it and the paragraph of the proposed order granting it. Five cells, and a gap in any one is a defect. Relief argued and never noticed is the common one, and it reads perfectly from inside the memorandum. Underneath sit the facts graded by what supports them and the authority checked for treatment and pin cites.

Five forms of relief, four documents, and the three joins that fail

The register that reconciles the filing, the opening paragraph the rule actually specifies, and the map from assertion to attached evidence.

Ardenwood Composites v. Kestrel Tooling Group  ·  motion for a preliminary injunction

Relief Register

Illustrative rows for a fictional trade secret dispute. Five forms of relief, three of which fail a join.

Relief soughtAuthorised byNoticedArguedEvidenceProposed order
Enjoin use of the layup schedules pending trialRule 65(a)Yes, ¶1§IIIOkonjo decl. ¶¶7-14, Ex. C¶1
Direct sequestration of the four drawing sets with counselRule 65(a)Yes, ¶1§III.CNone. No declaration says where they are¶2
Expedited discovery: three depositions and eight requests on 14 daysRule 26(d)(1)No§IVVance decl. ¶¶3-6¶3
Bond set at 50,000 dollarsRule 65(c)NoNowhereNone¶4
Order shortening time for the hearingStanding order, para 7No. Requires its own application in this courtNot part of this motionn/aRemove

Three different failures, none of which a proofread catches

Row three argues for relief the notice never asked for. A memorandum section arguing expedited discovery does not put it in front of the court, because the notice states the order being sought and this one does not state that.

Row four is in the proposed order and nowhere else. Security is a real requirement and it needs a number the memorandum justifies. A proposed order granting relief the brief never argued asks the judge to sign something the papers do not support.

Row two has the grounds and no evidence. Argued at III.C, granted at paragraph 2, and no declaration establishes where the drawing sets are or who holds them. An injunction has to describe the act required in reasonable detail and expressly cannot do it by pointing at the complaint, so a sequestration term with no evidenced location is unwritable as well as unproved.

Row five is the cheapest fix on the sheet. It belongs to a separate application in this forum and it comes out of the proposed order entirely.

What the opening paragraph actually owes

Two things, and they are the two things a memorandum cannot supply.

What usually goes outWhat is missing
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on 14 May at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, Plaintiff will move this Court for a preliminary injunction. The motion is based on this notice, the accompanying memorandum, the declarations filed herewith, and such other argument as may be presented at the hearing.Names one form of relief out of four, states no ground for any of them, and delegates both requirements to the memorandum by reference.
What goes out instead
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on 14 May at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6, Plaintiff Ardenwood Composites will move for an order (1) enjoining Kestrel Tooling Group and its officers, agents and employees from using, disclosing or transferring the layup schedules and the four associated drawing sets pending trial; (2) directing Kestrel to sequester those drawing sets with counsel within three days; and (3) permitting expedited discovery consisting of three depositions and eight document requests on fourteen days' notice.

The grounds are: that Kestrel's plant manager received the schedules from a former Ardenwood engineer on 3 February and used them in a quotation dated 19 February; that the schedules are subject to reasonable measures to keep them secret, including access control and a signed confidentiality agreement; that continued use will cost Ardenwood the Redhill programme, which cannot be restored by damages; and that expedited discovery is needed because the quotation deadline falls before ordinary discovery opens.

Security under Rule 65(c) is addressed at section V of the accompanying memorandum.

Grounds with particularity is a different test from a good argument

A ground is what makes the order issuable, stated as a proposition. Received on 3 February, used on 19 February, protected by named measures, unrestorable by damages. Four propositions, each of which a declaration paragraph proves and a memorandum section argues. Overbreadth, irreparable harm and balance of equities as bare phrases are labels, and a notice made of labels states no ground at all.

Every numbered form of relief in that paragraph is a row on the register, and the numbering carries through to the proposed order so the two can be read side by side.

Support Map

Every factual assertion in the memorandum, and the thing in the filing that establishes it. Attached is a different question from true.

Assertion in the memorandum§SupportAttachedServed with the motion
The former engineer emailed the schedules to Kestrel's plant manager on 3 FebruaryIII.AOkonjo decl. ¶9, Ex. CYesYes
Kestrel's 19 February quotation reproduces four of the schedule's tolerancesIII.AOkonjo decl. ¶11, Ex. D and EYesYes
Access to the schedules was limited to eleven named employeesIII.BOkonjo decl. ¶13Yes, but the access log is not an exhibitYes
Kestrel holds four physical drawing setsIII.CNothing in the filingNoNo
The Redhill programme is worth eleven per cent of annual revenueIII.DVance decl. ¶5Figure stated, source not identifiedYes
Kestrel refused to return the materials on 2 MarchIICounsel decl. ¶4, Ex. HYesYes

The last column is the one that gets assumed

A supporting affidavit is served with the motion, not after it. A declaration referenced in the brief and filed a week later is a defect in the motion rather than a scheduling detail, and it is invisible from inside the memorandum because the sentence citing it reads exactly the same either way.

Two rows worth arguing about before filing

Row three cites a declaration paragraph and not the document behind it. A statement in a pleading may be adopted by reference in another pleading or motion, and a written instrument attached as an exhibit is part of the pleading for all purposes. So the access log becomes part of the filing by being attached, and it is not part of anything by being described.

Row five states a number with no source. Eleven per cent of annual revenue is the figure the irreparable-harm argument turns on, and the declaration asserts it without saying what it was computed from.

What's in the pack

01

Relief Register

One row per form of relief: the authorising rule, the ground noticed, the section arguing it, the evidence proving it and the paragraph of the order granting it.

02

Notice of Motion and Motion

The opening paragraph written to what the rule asks for, with each form of relief numbered and each ground stated as a proposition rather than a label.

03

Memorandum of Points and Authorities

The argument, sectioned so that every section maps to a noticed ground, with the standard, the authority and the record cite in every assertion.

04

Support Map

Every factual assertion in the memorandum against the declaration paragraph or exhibit that establishes it, and whether that document is attached and served.

05

Supporting Declaration

Numbered paragraphs written so the register can cite them, each on personal knowledge, each naming the exhibit it authenticates.

06

Proposed Order

Numbered to the notice, so the relief granted and the relief noticed can be read side by side rather than compared from memory.

07

Document Set Register

What the filing consists of in this forum, who owes each piece, and what each one has to contain. It hands off to the rule-by-rule format check.

08

The Motion Is Not The Brief

The method doc: why a filing fails at the joins, and what each of the five reconciliations actually tests.

How to use it

  1. 1

    Open in River, or take it blank

    Open the pack in River and tell it what you are moving for, or download the Word documents and CSV sheets from the template library and fill them in.

  2. 2

    Start from the relief

    Every distinct thing you want from the court gets a row, with the rule that authorises it, before a word of argument is written.

  3. 3

    Then the grounds

    Each ground stated as a proposition a declaration paragraph can prove, not as a label like undue burden or irreparable harm.

  4. 4

    Reconcile before you file

    Five columns per row, five documents, and every empty cell named. The register is what makes a join visible.

Frequently asked questions

Is this template free?

Yes. The zip is Word documents and CSV sheets, no account and no card. Edit with AI is the other half: the agent builds the relief register first, drafts the set from it, and reports every join that does not reconcile. Other packs sit in the template library.

What format are the downloaded files?

Word (.docx) for the five documents and CSV (.csv) for the three sheets, zipped together. Excel, Numbers and Google Sheets open the registers straight off the download, and the notice, memorandum, declaration and order open in Word or Pages.

Why separate the notice from the memorandum?

Because the rules do. A motion has to state its grounds with particularity and state the relief sought, and a California notice of motion has to carry the nature of the order and the grounds in its opening paragraph. A memorandum satisfies neither of those by being excellent.

Does this work outside California and federal court?

Yes. The two rules cited are the clearest published statements of a requirement that state courts, appellate courts and administrative tribunals all impose in some form. The register is the mechanism, and the Document Set Register is where your forum's own list of pieces goes.

How is this different from a filing checklist?

A checklist asks whether each document was filed. This asks whether they agree. Relief argued and never noticed, relief in the order and never argued, and a ground with no evidence all pass a checklist, and all three are visible the moment the filing is read across. The same test runs at trial, where every exhibit needs a disposition rather than a checkmark.

Does it write the argument?

It drafts the memorandum from the register, section by section against noticed grounds. Every authority in it is checked for treatment and pin cites in a register built for exactly that, and the filing attorney verifies each citation before signing.

What does 'Edit with AI' actually do?

It signs you up, installs this exact pack as a private workspace, and puts the agent in front of an empty Relief Register. Then you say what you want the court to order, and the first thing back is that list with the authorising rule against each item.

Start from the relief, not the argument

Take the Word documents and CSV sheets blank, or open this exact pack in River and say what you want the court to order.

Edit with AI