River
Y CombinatorBacked by Y Combinator
Log InStart Free
FREE TEMPLATE

Board Meeting Prep Template for Investors

Three documents and three sheets that build the commitment register from the minutes first, then attribute the quarter's variance to the commitments behind it.

Edit with AIDownload Word and CSV

Free download  ·  No account needed

What you get

Pack of 6 files: 3 documents, 3 spreadsheets

Board Meeting Prep Template for Investors
  • Prior Commitment ReviewDocument
  • Pre-read BriefDocument
  • Question SetDocument
  • Open Action RegisterSpreadsheet
  • Metric TrendSpreadsheet
  • Commitment to Variance MapSpreadsheet
RiverBoard Meeting Prep Template for Investors

Pre-read Brief

[Company] — Board Pack Brief, [meeting date]

One page. The reader has the full pack in their inbox and an hour on a train, so one page is the specification rather than the aspiration.

The one thing

What the pack reports, what the board approved, and which of the two the meeting should be about. Named in the first sentence and not the fourth paragraph.

What the pack covers, and what it does not

The pack’s own scope, then the questions it leaves unanswerable, so nobody spends the meeting hunting for a slide that was never in it.

The trend the pack does not show

MetricThis packLast reportedPeriods missing
————
————
————

A metric that stopped being reported is an event, so the cell reads not reported rather than sitting blank. A blank looks like a formatting artefact and gets skipped.

Prior commitments, and what happened to them

What was committed at the last meeting, by whom, against what date, and which of those dates has already passed.

What the meeting can actually decide

The decisions inside the board’s gift this session, separated from the ones needing a consent or another quarter of data.

Ledmore Automation's board pack landed on Friday, 52 pages, five days before Wednesday's meeting. It reports new ARR of 1,457,500 dollars against a plan-to-date of 2,125,000 and attributes the 667,500 shortfall to longer enterprise sales cycles. Six sets of minutes say something else. Two commitments this board approved in March account for 587,500 of the gap, and the explanation in the pack accounts for 80,000, which is 12 per cent of it.

The two are A-23, six quota-carrying reps by 30 June, of which three were hired and late, and A-24, a 6 per cent renewal uplift effective 1 April. A-24 was approved on 11 March, appears in no later minutes, and is not in the pack at all. It is worth 175,000 dollars of the shortfall on its own. Every board pack template on page one has an action list. All of them carry it forward from the last pack, which is the one document that cannot show what stopped being carried.

So the register is built from the minutes before the pack is opened, and every commitment gets one of three states: closed with a recorded outcome, open, or dropped. Delaware law puts both documents in the same category. Minutes of a board meeting and the materials given to the board are books and records a stockholder can demand, and a director is protected when relying on those records. The portfolio-level view runs the same test across every company.

Thirty-four commitments, nine of them dropped, and the two that carry 88 per cent of the quarter's miss

The Open Action Register, the Commitment to Variance Map, the Metric Trend across packs and the brief they produce.

Board Meeting Prep Template for Investors
RiverOpen Action Register

Open Action Register

Illustrative, for a fictional portfolio company. Built from six sets of minutes, March 2025 to June 2026, before the 4 September 2026 pack was opened. Sixteen of the 34 rows shown. Every target date the commitment has been given is kept, so slippage is a number of days rather than a fresh item on a fresh list.

IDCommitmentOwnerRaisedDates givenSlippageStateLast raisedIn the pack
A-06Stand up a security programme ahead of SOC 2CTOJun 253275 dopenJun 26yes
A-05Reprice the two loss-making legacy contractsCROMar 254273 dopenJun 26no
A-19Add an independent directorCEODec 253184 dopenJun 26no
A-11Reduce customer concentration below 20 per centCROSep 252183 dopenJun 26yes
A-16Document the top ten customer renewal datesCROSep 253182 dopen, overdueJun 26no
A-23Hire six quota-carrying reps by 30 June 2026CROMar 26292 dopenJun 26yes
A-25Reduce net burn to under 900,000 a monthCEOMar 26292 dopenJun 26yes
A-26Bring a build-versus-buy paper on the data platformCTOMar 26292 dopenJun 26no
A-24Implement the 6 per cent renewal uplift from 1 AprilCROMar 2610 ddroppedMar 26no
A-21Report net dollar retention every quarterVP FinanceDec 2510 ddroppedMar 26no
A-10Report gross margin split by product and servicesVP FinanceJun 25292 ddroppedDec 25no
A-27Report pipeline coverage against the quarter's targetCROMar 2610 ddroppedJun 26no
A-04Present a churn cohort analysis by segmentCROMar 253182 ddroppedMar 26no
A-09Publish a pricing and discount approval matrixCROJun 25291 ddroppedMar 26no
A-12Hire a VP EngineeringCTOSep 253181 dclosedJun 26n/a
A-17Close the Series B extensionCEODec 25291 dclosedJun 26n/a

34 commitments. 14 closed, 11 open, 9 dropped. Eight of the eleven open ones have been re-dated at least once, thirteen re-datings in total, 1,372 cumulative days of slippage, median 183 days. Dropped means it appeared in the minutes, then stopped, with no outcome ever recorded. It is not the same state as closed and it is the state every action list collapses into closed, because both produce silence in the current minutes.

RiverCommitment to Variance Map

Commitment to Variance Map

New ARR, 1 April to 31 August 2026, against the FY27 plan the board approved on 11 March 2026. The plan assumed six new reps from 1 April on a three-month ramp, four existing reps at 75,000 a month of quota, and a 6 per cent renewal uplift worth 420,000 across the year.

LineIDPlan to dateActualVarianceShareCommitment state
Four existing repsnone1,500,0001,420,00080,00012.0%Ordinary plan variance
Six new repsA-23450,00037,500412,50061.8%open, re-dated once, 92 days
6 per cent renewal upliftA-24175,0000175,00026.2%dropped, no outcome recorded
New ARR booked2,125,0001,457,500667,500100%Pack says: longer sales cycles
Traceable to a commitmentA-23, A-24625,00037,500587,50088.0%Neither is named in the pack

Three reps were hired, on 15 May, 22 July and 18 August, against a plan of six from 1 April, and only the first has reached the paid part of its ramp. The uplift was approved on 11 March, effective 1 April, and has not been raised since. The explanation the pack gives can carry 80,000 of the 667,500. The forward view is the same arithmetic: reps four to six starting 1 November with the uplift live from 1 October lands FY27 at 4,930,500 against a 7,395,000 plan. Neither happening lands it at 4,495,500. The 435,000 between those two cases is a hiring approval and a pricing decision, not a market condition.

RiverMetric Trend

Metric Trend

Every metric any pack has reported, across six prior packs and the current one. A period with no figure reads not reported rather than blank, because a blank cell looks like a formatting artefact and this is an event.

MetricMar 25Jun 25Sep 25Dec 25Mar 26Jun 26Pack 4 SepCommitment
New ARR booked, quarter1.18m1.24m1.31m1.40m1.12m845k594kA-23
Revenue, quarter3.41m3.56m3.72m3.91m4.04m4.12m4.18m
Gross margin71%71%70%69%68%not reportednot reportedA-10
Net dollar retention114%112%109%106%103%not reportednot reportedA-21
Pipeline coverage3.6x3.4x3.1x2.9x2.6xnot reportednot reportedA-27
Customer concentration, top account27%26%26%25%24%23%23%A-11
Quota-carrying reps4444457A-23
Headcount849198104111118121A-31
Cash21.4m19.1m16.7m14.1m11.4m8.80m6.15m
Net burn, monthly767k800k867k900k933k967k1,050kA-25

Three metrics stopped after the March 2026 pack, and each had declined in every period it was reported. All three were reporting commitments the board made: A-10, A-21 and A-27. Three stopping in the same period is a reporting change rather than three coincidences, and the answer to all three is one email from the finance team. Net burn is still reported and has gone from 767,000 to 1,050,000 against A-25's commitment to get it under 900,000.

RiverPre-read Brief

Pre-read Brief

The whole of it. One page is the specification, not an aspiration: the reader has 52 pages in their inbox and an hour on a train.

The one thing

The pack reports new ARR of 1,457,500 against a plan-to-date of 2,125,000, and attributes the 667,500 shortfall to longer enterprise sales cycles and a softer funding environment among customers. Two commitments this board approved on 11 March 2026 account for 587,500 of it, 88 per cent. The explanation the pack gives accounts for 80,000.

What the pack covers

Of the twenty live commitments in the register, eleven open and nine dropped, the 52-page pack mentions four. All four are open ones. None of the nine dropped commitments appears anywhere. Sections 4 through 9, twenty-two of the fifty-two pages, are product and engineering updates with no decision attached and no commitment behind them. They can be read after the meeting.

What the meeting can decide

Reps four to six starting 1 November with the uplift live from 1 October lands FY27 at 4,930,500, or 66.7 per cent of the approved plan. Neither happening lands it at 4,495,500, or 60.8 per cent. 435,000 separates the two. Cash is 6,150,000 against burn of 1,050,000 a month, so the hiring question and the runway question are the same question.

What this brief does not do

It does not judge whether the sales cycle lengthened, which may also be true and does not change the arithmetic above. Every finding in the register has an innocent explanation available: a template that changed with the finance lead, a reporting line nobody owned, a decision taken verbally and never minuted. The questions exist to find out which.

Edit with AI

What is in the pack

01

Open Action Register

One row per commitment in the minutes, carrying every target date it has been given in order, the number of re-datings, the slippage in days, and a state of closed, open or dropped

02

Commitment to Variance Map

The plan the board approved decomposed into its lines, each with plan-to-date, actual, variance and the commitment ID behind it, summing to the variance the pack reports

03

Metric Trend

Every metric any pack has ever reported, across all of them rather than this quarter against last, with each period a metric was not reported written out as an event

04

Prior Commitment Review

Written from the minutes before the current pack is opened, so what was committed is established from documents the pack cannot influence

05

Pre-read Brief

One page: the largest number on the agenda and where the arithmetic puts it, the share of live commitments the pack addresses, and the pages that carry no decision

06

Question Set

Four questions, each naming a commitment, its date, the figure at stake and the single answer that settles it, ordered by the size of the number attached

07

Three states, not two

A space rule that keeps dropped separate from closed, because a commitment nobody raised again produces the same silence as one that was completed

How it works

  1. 1

    Send the minutes first

    Every set you have, oldest first. Six meetings is enough for the register to mean something. The current pack comes later, on purpose.

  2. 2

    Build the register

    Every commitment becomes a row with each date it has been given. Closed needs a recorded outcome. Silence makes it dropped, not closed.

  3. 3

    Then open the pack

    Decompose the approved plan into its lines, compute plan-to-date and actual for each, and attach the commitment ID behind every one that has one.

  4. 4

    Write one page and four questions

    The brief names the largest number and where it comes from. Each question carries a commitment, a date, a figure and one answer that settles it.

Frequently asked questions

Why not build the register from the pack's own action list?

Because a pack's action list is what the company chose to carry forward, and the register exists to find what it did not. The action list here has four items. The minutes have twenty live ones. Reading the pack first also means everything you look for in the minutes is something the pack put there.

Is a dropped commitment really different from a closed one?

Closed means a later set of minutes records an outcome, including a formal decision to abandon it. Dropped means no outcome was ever recorded and nobody raised it again. Nine of the thirty-four here are dropped, and one of them carries 175,000 dollars of the quarter's shortfall.

Does this accuse management of hiding the miss?

No, and it is written not to. A template that changed with a new finance lead, a reporting line nobody owned, and a decision taken verbally all produce an identical gap in the register. The arithmetic establishes how much of a variance each explanation can carry. Which one is true comes out of asking.

We only have one or two sets of minutes. Does it still work?

The register works from one. The slippage and dropped-commitment analysis needs three or four, and the metric trend needs the prior packs rather than the minutes. Start with what you have and the register gets more useful every cycle, since this quarter's minutes are next quarter's input.

How does this differ from monitoring the portfolio?

This is one company and one meeting, driven by the minutes. Normalising metrics across every company you hold is the portfolio monitoring pack, and reading a single monthly email against the ones before it is founder update analysis. All three run the same test on different documents.

Does it decide anything about the investment?

No. It produces no vote recommendation, no reserve decision and no valuation view. It reports what was committed, what was reported and where the two do not meet. The thesis the position was taken on lives in the investment committee memo, and the board decides what to do.

What format are the downloaded files?

Word documents for the review, the brief and the question set, and CSV for the three sheets. The documents open in Word, Pages and Google Docs. The sheets open in Excel, Numbers and Sheets with the columns intact, and no conversion step in between.

Sources

  1. Delaware CodeDelaware Code Title 8, Chapter 1, Subchapter 7 (opens in a new tab)
  2. Delaware CodeDelaware Code Title 8, Chapter 1, Subchapter 4 (opens in a new tab)

Written by

Chandler Supple

Co-founder & CEO, River

Chandler has spent the last six years working in AI, building tools for millions of users and Fortune 100 companies. In 2025, he co-founded River to build a new kind of operating system for AI agents.

LinkedInGitHubX

Reviewed by

Brian Joseff, Co-founder, River

LinkedInX

Related

VC portfolio monitoring template

The same test across every company you hold, with a cash-out date per position

Founder update analysis

One monthly email read against the ones before it, for the metrics that stopped

Investment committee memo template

The thesis and the definitions the position was taken on, with a source per figure

More free templates

Portfolio Watchlist Criteria Template

Watchlist criteria template that dates when a trigger fires against when a partner actually responds, not only whether the trigger was correct.

VC Portfolio Company Support Template

Support requests to portfolio companies logged against a recorded outcome, not just whether the introduction or hire happened, by category and by company.

VC Portfolio Monitoring Template

Portfolio monitoring template that turns every reported runway into a cash-out date computed from the company's own as-of date, not from today.

Capital Call Notice Template for GPs

Capital call notice template for GPs. Each tranche allocates across its own basis, then the wires reconcile to the notice and the capital accounts to NAV.

Find out what your last six meetings committed to

Send the minutes and the pack for the meeting coming up. The first pass builds the register from the minutes alone, then attributes the quarter's variance to it.

Prepare for the meeting