River
Y CombinatorBacked by Y Combinator

Finance & AccountingFree

Revenue Timing Review Before Signature

River reads the draft for the clauses that move revenue timing, prices each one against the quarter that is closing, and writes the redline.

Start here

Every revenue recognition checklist on page one is written for the accountant documenting a contract that is already signed. By then the analysis is arithmetic: the clause says what it says, and the only question left is how faithfully you report it. The leverage sits upstream, in the two days when the draft is still a draft and a sentence can still be changed. This reads the draft for the sentences that move timing, and prices each one.

The size of that is not theoretical. Veeva Systems added termination for convenience rights to some of its master subscription agreements, and the SEC staff asked the company to quantify what that did to revenue recognition. The answer: those orders became cancellable, revenue then tracked what was invoiced, and the change cost 28 million dollars of contract assets and revenue in one year, with a further 62 million estimated on top. One clause, in the standard form.

Written for the controller who gets the draft from the deal desk with 48 hours left on the clock, and for the revenue accountant who would rather argue about one sentence than restate a schedule later. Once it is signed, the five-step memo documents whatever the paper says. The policy the whole portfolio runs on is scored in the revenue policy pack, cancellability moves the backlog number inside the recurring revenue pack, and the same evidence-first shape drives the capitalization memo.

Ranked by dollars, the list reorders

Run the five clauses in the worked example below and the ordering inverts. The acceptance provision, which no checklist leads with, is worth 145,591 dollars in the closing quarter, or 80 percent of everything the redlines are worth together. The termination clause, which every checklist does lead with, is worth 5,479. The SEC staff has asked a filer how it evaluated the effect of a customer acceptance clause on when control of an asset transfers, and that is the question the draft language decides.

Order still matters, and it is not the order of value. Striking the convenience right has to come first, because a cancellable contract has no 36-month allocation for the other four findings to move. And the compromise the customer will offer, a convenience exit only at each anniversary, buys back 87 percent of the quarter and 12 percent of the disclosed backlog. Which of those two is under pressure decides whether to take it, and that is worth knowing before the room.

So the output is three things. The register entry as the draft stands, obligation by obligation, with the control-transfer event and date behind each figure. Then the proposed language for each clause, marked with what it genuinely asks the customer to give up, because four of these five cost them nothing they would defend. Then the trade: a five percent discount returns 21 cents in the quarter per dollar conceded, so price is the expensive way to buy the same result.

How it works

  1. Add the draft

    Upload the master agreement, the order form, every exhibit, and any redlines the customer has already sent back.

  2. Add your own history

    Say how long acceptance certificates and purchase orders really take at your company, because that is what prices the clauses.

  3. River prices each clause

    It settles the enforceable term first, works the register both ways, then ranks every finding by what it is worth.

  4. Take what matters

    Argue for the two or three that carry the dollars and drop the rest before the paper goes back.

What you get

  • Every timing clause found and priced against the quarter that is closing, not merely flagged
  • The enforceable contract term settled from the termination clause before any recognition date is set
  • Proposed language for each clause, with what it actually asks the customer to give up
  • The register entry as the draft stands, so the accounting is visible before anyone signs
  • Findings ranked by what they are worth, so the two not worth trading for get dropped
  • What buying the same quarter with a discount would cost instead, per dollar conceded

Common questions

Is this a revenue recognition memo?

No. A memo documents a contract you have already signed, and by then the clause is settled. This runs while the language is still negotiable, so every finding comes with proposed wording rather than a conclusion. Once the paper is executed, the five-step memo is the right artifact and this one has nothing left to change.

What do I need to give it?

The draft master agreement, the order form, and every exhibit and side letter attached to them. Then what the components list for on their own, so the allocation has evidence behind it. Then your own delivery record, which is the input almost nobody thinks to bring and the one that turns a flagged clause into a dollar figure.

Why does our delivery record matter?

Because it is what prices an acceptance clause. Language requiring a countersigned certificate with no deadline costs nothing if your customers sign in a week and costs a quarter if they take four months. In the worked example, 34 prior builds took a median of 118 days and nine were never signed at all, so the fee is an FY28 item.

What if the customer rejects everything?

Then you have the number, which is more than you had. You also know which asks to spend the relationship on: a deemed-acceptance backstop costs the customer only the right to stay silent, while striking a convenience right costs them real flexibility. Ranking the findings tells you which two to drop before the call rather than during it.

Does this replace legal review?

No, and it answers a different question. Counsel reads the draft for risk, liability and remedy. This reads the same paper for when revenue is recognised, which is a question counsel has no reason to ask. The two reviews find different clauses, and the covenant definition extractor applies the same move to a lender's definitions.

Can I run it on our standard paper?

That is where it pays for itself. Review the template once and every deal on it inherits the fix, which is the opposite of catching the same clause in 40 separate contracts at close. The SEC staff has pushed a filer to confirm that substantially all of its arrangements contained a material right because the option sat in its standard form.

Revenue Timing Review Before Signature

Fill in the form and your workspace opens with the work already underway.