Finance & AccountingFree
ASC 606 Revenue Recognition Memo Template
One signed contract becomes the five-step analysis your reviewer can check, with the enforceable term settled first and every judgment named and defended.
River reads the signed agreement, the order form and every amendment, then writes the five-step analysis with a clause reference standing behind each conclusion. The obligations land in a sheet with the allocation worked to the dollar. What separates a memo a reviewer signs off from one that comes back is never the model, which is public and identical everywhere, but whether a conclusion can be checked against the paper in a single hop. Every line here carries the section that produced it.
Step one is not a formality, and it is where the money is. The guidance runs over the period in which both parties hold present enforceable rights and obligations, and the SEC staff has asked a registrant to explain exactly that, naming the section of the exhibit it wanted read. A thirty-six month order form carrying a costless exit at sixty days is a sixty day contract. Whether the termination fee is substantive is the first judgment in the file, and it moves more revenue than any allocation.
Written for the controller or revenue accountant documenting an agreement that does not fit the standard template, and for anyone building the file for a first audit under the standard. The obligation register feeds the deferred revenue rollforward inside the monthly close pack. The timing it fixes drives next quarter's variance in flux commentary. Where the paper needs abstracting before any of this begins, contract obligation extraction reads the agreement into a register first.
The judgments, pulled out from the arithmetic
A reviewer does not argue with your multiplication. They argue with the four or five places you chose something. The SEC staff asks filers to describe the judgements used in determining the timing of satisfaction and the amounts allocated to each obligation, which is a wholly different request from showing the allocation itself. So the memo runs on two tracks: what the contract mechanically produces, and what a person decided. Each decision carries the reading it displaced and the sentence that settled the matter.
The clauses that move revenue are seldom the ones printed under a pricing heading. An acceptance provision that deems acceptance on thirty days of silence transfers control on a different date from one demanding written sign-off. The staff has told a filer its policy did not comply because it recognized on conveyance of title rather than transfer of control. Renewal priced under list is a material right that takes part of today's fee with it. Service credits are variable consideration. Each one gets found and mapped to its step.
What comes out is a memo and a sheet that agree with each other line for line. The sheet holds one row per obligation with its standalone selling price, the evidence for that price, its allocated share and its recognition pattern, so the schedule is arithmetic anyone can rerun from the inputs. The memo holds the reasoning: the enforceable term and why, why each obligation stands alone, how variable consideration was estimated and constrained, and the calls worth pushing on.
How it works
Add the contract
Upload the master agreement, the order form and every amendment or side letter attached to it.
Name the questions
Say what your auditor pushed on last year and which conclusions you are least sure of.
River works the steps
Enforceable term first, then obligations, price, allocation and timing, each anchored to a clause.
Review the judgments
Argue with the five calls the memo isolates rather than reading the whole document again.
What you get
- The enforceable contract term settled first, from the termination clause rather than the cover page
- Every conclusion carrying the section number of the agreement that actually drives it
- Performance obligations in a sheet with standalone selling price, evidence, allocation and pattern
- Judgments listed apart from the mechanics, each carrying the reading it displaced and why
- Variable consideration found across service credits, usage tiers, rebates and penalty clauses
- Renewal options and stepped discounts tested as material rights before allocation runs
Common questions
Is this another walkthrough of the five-step model?
No. The model is in the standard and every firm publishes the same summary of it. What a reviewer cannot get from a summary is which sentence of your agreement drove each conclusion. River works from the paper you signed, so the memo reads as findings about that contract rather than a restatement of the guidance.
What do I need to give it?
The master agreement, the order form and every amendment, side letter and statement of work. Then whatever you have on standalone pricing: list prices, recent separate deals, partner rate cards. Where a component has never sold on its own, say so, and the memo documents the estimation basis instead of inventing an observed price.
How does it work out the contract term?
From the termination clause, not the term printed on the order form. It finds who can exit, on what notice, and at what cost, then tests whether that cost is substantive against the service being given up. A costless exit at sixty days makes a three-year deal a sixty-day contract, and the memo says so in step one. Before signature, the timing flag review proposes the redline instead.
What happens when standalone selling price is not observable?
The memo names the approach it used and the evidence behind it rather than asserting a number. A partner rate card, a margin build from cost, a residual where the price is genuinely uncertain. Each estimate appears in the judgments table with the alternative it displaced, so a reviewer can push on the basis rather than the total.
Will this stand up in an audit?
It is built for that conversation. Judgments sit in their own table with the reading each one displaced and the clause that settled it, and the mechanics reconcile to the dollar from four inputs. Your reviewer spends the meeting on the five decisions that matter instead of tracing arithmetic through a document. The software capitalization memo is built to the same shape.
Can I run it across a portfolio of similar contracts?
Yes, one memo per contract, and the obligation registers consolidate into a single deferred revenue rollforward. Where a hundred contracts share one paper form, the first memo becomes the reference and later ones document only where they depart from it. The ledger side comes through the normalized trial balance, and the policy the whole portfolio runs on gets scored in the revenue recognition policy pack.
Does it cover contract modifications?
Amendments come in with the original and get treated as what they are. The memo states whether each one adds distinct goods at their standalone price, replaces the remaining contract, or reprices what is left, and shows the effect on the schedule. Definitions that a lender reads differently go through the covenant definition extractor.
ASC 606 Revenue Recognition Memo Template
Fill in the form and your workspace opens with the work already underway.