Is this template free?
Yes. Download the whole pack as Word documents and CSV sheets with no signup and no credit card. Edit with AI is a separate, optional path that has the agent build the register and write the strategies with you. The template library holds the rest of the packs.
What format are the downloaded files?
Word documents (.docx) for the three documents and the rule, and CSV (.csv) for the three sheets, in one zip. They open natively in Word, Pages, Google Docs, Excel, Numbers and Sheets with nothing to convert. Inside River the same content opens as live Docs and Sheets.
What does 'Edit with AI' actually do?
It creates a free River account and installs this exact pack as a private workspace. It opens asking for your review question, your databases and your seed set, then builds the term register against those papers and writes one strategy for peer review before translating it.
Does River run the searches for me?
No. The strings are written here and executed in the platform your institution licenses, which is the only place a search history export exists. What comes back into the space is the pasted string, the date and the count, and those three are what the reporting standard asks for.
Does this deduplicate my records?
No, and the sheets assume something else does. Yield by Database records the unique count per source and the order deduplication ran in, because that order decides the column. The duplicate merge plan covers a merged library where a citation manager's own matching is the risk.
Is this only for health reviews?
No. The worked example uses MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO because most readers of this query work there, and the structure is identical for ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, Business Source Premier or a legal database. Controlled vocabulary differs per database, which the register already handles as a column.
How is this different from a search strategy template?
A template gives you a concept grid, which is the search you meant to run. Reviews with a librarian as an author still report a reproducible search only 64 per cent of the time. The record is what is missing: pasted string, date, count per source. The synthesis writer takes over once screening ends.