Is this template free?
Yes. Download the pack's three documents and two sheets with no signup and no credit card, filled in for the worked example. Edit with AI installs the same pack as a private River workspace. There, the agent reads your own scripts folder and draft manuscript, and builds the register and the map from your files.
What format are the downloaded files?
Word documents for the README, Environment Note and Data Provenance Statement, and CSV for File Register and Output Map, all in one zip. Nothing needs converting: they open in Word, Pages, Google Docs, Excel, Numbers and Sheets. Inside River the same content opens as live Docs and Sheets that update as you send more files.
Doesn't a build tool like Make or Snakemake already solve this?
A build tool re-runs a pipeline it already understands as a formal dependency graph. That is a real fix, once every script has been rewritten into that tool's own rule syntax. This pack does not require that rewrite. It reads the modified time already sitting on every script and output file in an ordinary folder, so it works on the pipeline you already have.
What counts as an orphaned script versus a stale exhibit?
Stale means the script producing a claimed exhibit was edited after its output file was last written. The number on the page may not match what the code would produce today. Orphaned means a script or output file exists that neither the paper's own exhibit list nor the master script's run order accounts for, in either direction.
I don't have a master script that runs everything in order. Does the pack still work?
Yes, with one honest gap. File Register records the run order you can describe rather than inventing one, and Output Map still traces each exhibit to its script. What it cannot check without a master script is whether a script nobody calls was meant to run at all, and the register says so rather than guessing.
Does this check whether my analysis or specification is any good?
No. It checks whether the record of what produced what still matches the files you have, not whether the specification behind any exhibit is defensible. Testing that specification against reasonable alternatives is a separate question a dedicated robustness checks pack answers. Re-running a reviewer's requested control is what would make Output Map current again.