Two-Stage Intake · one firm’s existing intake form, re-sorted
Eight questions, and three of them belong on the first call
Every question below is on a real intake form in use somewhere. The problem is never how many you ask. It is how much you hear before the search comes back.
| Question on the form today | Stage | What hearing it early costs |
|---|---|---|
| Full legal name, and any name you trade under | One | Nothing. This is the string the search runs on |
| Everyone else involved, by full legal name | One | Nothing |
| Parents, subsidiaries, guarantors, insurers | One | Nothing, and leaving it off is why searches come back empty |
| Please describe what happened | Two | The facts of the matter, from someone the firm may end up opposite |
| What outcome are you hoping for | Two | Their commercial objective, which is the most useful thing the other side could have |
| What documents do you have | Two | Custody of material before anyone knows whether it can be received |
| Have you instructed anyone else on this | Two | Their alternatives, and how far along they are |
| What budget do you have in mind | Two | What they can sustain, which prices a strategy against them |
Why the line falls exactly there
The screening route out of a firm-wide disqualification opens only where the lawyer who heard the information took reasonable measures to avoid exposure to more disqualifying information than was reasonably necessary to decide whether to act. Rows four to eight are those measures, not taken.
The form does not get shorter. It gets cut in half, and the second half runs after the conflict search clears.