River
Y CombinatorBacked by Y Combinator
FREE TEMPLATE

Founder First Meeting Questions Template

Two documents and two sheets that rank a first-meeting checklist by what the deck and a quick public-record pass could not already answer.

Free download  ·  No account needed

Question Set

[Company] — First Meeting Question Set

Every question below already cleared two filters: the deck’s own text, and a short public-record pass. Anything either source answers does not appear here.

Asked in the meeting

#CategoryQuestion
1Screening gap
2Screening gap
3Founder judgment

Cut line drawn at the number of questions the real meeting length actually holds, roughly two and a half minutes each including one follow-up.

Held for a second conversation

Ranked but below the cut line. Asked only if time remains.

Already answered, not on this list

Cleared by the deck or the public-record pass. Listed once, at the bottom, so nobody re-asks by accident.

Every public list of first-meeting questions runs in the same order, regardless of what the deck already states. What problem you are solving, what the business model is, tell me about the team: these are all things a seed-stage deck routinely puts on its own slides. Checked against one real deck plus a short public-record pass, a standard 24-question checklist already has thirteen questions answered, fifty-four per cent, before anyone sits down. Eleven remain, and three of those eleven are the specific gaps a screen already flagged as never stated.

Thirty minutes holds about twenty of real question time once framing and wrap-up are subtracted, which fits roughly eight questions at two and a half minutes each with a follow-up. Asked in whatever order a generic checklist prints them, the expected result is under four new answers out of the eight, and there is better than a one-in-four chance none of the three screening gaps get asked at all. Ordered by what only the founder can answer, gaps first, every one of the eight slots returns something the file did not already have.

Structured interview research finds a fixed, ranked question order more reliable than an unstructured one in every setting it has been tested. The same survey of 885 venture capitalists this pack's ranking logic borrows from finds VCs rate the team as more decisive than the business itself, exactly the judgment a generic checklist spends least of its time on. The Answer Register records what came back; a meeting that advances moves the pipeline stage the same day, and feeds the investment committee memo that follows.

One meeting, prepared so every question in it earns its slot

The Meeting Brief, Question Set, Answer Register and Follow-up Request List for one prepared first meeting.

Meeting Brief

Larkspur Robotics, illustrative. Seed round, warehouse pick-and-place automation. Deck is 13 slides, screened 24 April 2026; three gaps came back load-bearing.

Already established

Founded 2023. Two co-founders: a CEO with six years at a robotics OEM, and a CTO who led perception software at a logistics-automation startup acquired in 2022. Both confirmed on LinkedIn, consistent with the deck's team slide. Company site lists three named pilot customers, matching the deck. No prior institutional round found in public registries; the deck's stated 1.8 million dollar angel pre-seed is noted as deck-only, not confirmed.

What the deck does not say

Three fields with no stated figure: burn multiple, net dollar retention, and whether the CTO's prior role carried P&L or hiring authority. None of the three is answerable from the public-record pass either.

Why this meeting

Of a standard 24-question checklist, the deck and public record already answer 13, fifty-four per cent. Eleven remain: the three gaps above plus eight founder-judgment questions. Twenty minutes of real question time holds about eight at two to three minutes each, the cut line on the Question Set.

Question Set

Ranked: screening gaps first, then founder-judgment by how much the answer changes what happens next. Cut line after question 8.

#CategoryQuestion
1Screening gapNet new recurring revenue against net cash burn, last month
2Screening gapShare of year-plus customers still paying the same or more
3Screening gapWhat the CTO's prior role actually covered day to day
4Founder judgmentWhy this problem, why now, rather than two years either direction
5Founder judgmentWhat would change your own mind in the next two quarters
6Founder judgmentWhich pilot is closest to a contract, what holds the other two back
7Founder judgmentHow the raise changes if it closes at half the target
8Founder judgmentMost frequent operating disagreement, and how it gets resolved
Held3 more, ranked, asked only if time remains

Already answered by the deck or public record, not on this list: market sizing, pricing model, prior funding history, team background, use of funds. Thirteen of twenty-four questions clear this bar.

Answer Register

Filled in during the meeting, one row per question actually asked.

#Answer givenDirectnessResolved
138,000 net new MRR against 61,000 net cash burn, a 1.6x multipleDirectYes
2Two of three pilots past 12 months; one renewed higher, one flat, one has no anniversary yetPartialNo
3Led a team of nine, owned the perception roadmap budget, no hiring authority over salesDirectYes
4Automation demand accelerated after a 2025 labor-cost report; two competitors solve a narrower sliceDirectn/a
5–8Recorded in full; one recurring operating disagreement flagged as a pattern worth watchingDirectn/a

Row 2 is the one that matters. A partial answer on net dollar retention, with a stated reason it could not be fuller yet, becomes the first line on the Follow-up Request List rather than a re-ask.

Follow-up Request List

Sent the same day, one message rather than one email per gap.

PriorityItemRequested fieldBlocking
1Net dollar retention detailRenewal or expansion status for the two other pilots at their 12-month markYes
2Hiring plan detailNames and start-quarter for the two planned hiresNo
3Competitive positioningWhat the two named competitors do differently, and why Larkspur did not match itNo

Only item 1 blocks the file from being IC-ready. Items 2 and 3 were simply held for time and can wait for a second conversation rather than an email.

What is in the pack

01

Meeting Brief

What the deck and a public-record pass already establish, what neither answers, and how many of a standard checklist's questions that leaves for the room

02

Question Set

Every surviving question ranked screening gaps first, with the cut line marked at what the actual meeting length can hold at two to three minutes each

03

Answer Register

One row per question actually asked, with a column for whether the answer contradicted the deck, filled in during or right after the meeting rather than from memory

04

Follow-up Request List

Every unresolved gap and partial answer in one message, prioritized by which ones actually block the file from being ready for committee

05

The already-answered rule

A standing instruction that nothing goes on the question set until it has been checked against the deck's own text and a short public-record pass

How it works

  1. 1

    Send the deck and any gaps

    Attach the deck as PDF or PowerPoint, the company name, and any screening gaps already on file. Nothing else is required to start.

  2. 2

    Build the question set

    The deck gets read in full, a short public-record pass runs against it, and every candidate question is checked against both before it earns a spot on the ranked list.

  3. 3

    Ask what only the room can answer

    Screening gaps first, then founder-judgment questions ranked by how much the answer changes what happens next, cut off at what the real meeting length can hold.

  4. 4

    Fill the register, then send one list

    The Answer Register records what came back during the meeting itself. Whatever stays blank or partial becomes one Follow-up Request List, not one email per gap.

Frequently asked questions

Why check the deck and the public record before writing the question list?

Because a question the deck already answers is not a question, it is a rehearsal. Checked against one real deck plus a short public-record pass, a standard 24-question first-meeting checklist already has thirteen questions answered, fifty-four per cent, before anyone sits down. Asking those thirteen again spends slots the meeting cannot afford to lose.

What if we do not have a screen on this deal yet?

It still works. Screening gaps go to the top of the list automatically when they exist, but the founder-judgment half does not depend on one. The question set still checks every candidate against the deck and the public record, drops what is already answered, and ranks what is left by how much the answer would change what happens next.

Does the question set take a position on whether the deal is any good?

No. Screening already decided whether a meeting happens; this space only decides what gets asked inside it. Several founder-judgment questions, why this problem and why now among them, are really testing fit against whatever the fund's own investment thesis claims. Judging the company itself happens afterward, in a different document with a different discipline.

What happens to the Answer Register once the meeting ends?

It becomes the record of what was actually said, contradictions and deflections included, and whatever it shows blank or partial turns into one follow-up message rather than one email per gap. A meeting that advances moves the deal's pipeline stage the same day, and the register is what a later investment memo cites when it needs the room's own judgment, not the deck's.

What does Edit with AI actually do?

It installs this pack as your own private space, then works from the deck and any screening notes you send. It reads the deck, runs the public-record pass, builds the ranked question set, and fills the Answer Register from your notes or a transcript once the meeting happens. You review and correct every step rather than approve a finished file.

What format are the downloaded files?

The Meeting Brief and Question Set download as Word documents; the Answer Register and Follow-up Request List download as CSV. Word opens in Word, Pages or Google Docs, and the CSVs open in Excel, Numbers or Sheets with the columns intact. Nothing needs converting before you can use it in the room.

See how many of your last ten first meetings asked something the deck already answered

Send the deck and any screening gaps. The first pass returns the ranked question set and marks the cut line before the meeting starts.

Edit with AI