Request Tracker
Stonemarket Data, Inc. Keyed to the investor's item numbers, verbatim. A selection of the eighty-four rows.
| Their item | Their wording | Status | Owner | Days | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.7 | SOC 2 Type II report | Never applied | CTO | 2 | No certification held. Security summary at 2.9 instead |
| 4.4 | Copies of all section 83(b) elections filed | Sent with memo | Counsel | 5 | Eleven of twelve inside 30 days. RS-07 filed on day 41 |
| 4.9 | Board consent authorising each option grant | Should exist, missing | Counsel | 18 | Sept 2024 grant had no locatable consent. Ratifying consent adopted |
| 4.10 | Minutes of every board meeting, last 24 months | Should exist, missing | Counsel | 11 | Nov 2023 meeting had no minutes. Reconstructed and adopted |
| 5.3 | Transfer pricing documentation | Never applied | Founder | 1 | Not applicable. No non-US entity, per item 5.2 |
| 7.11 | Any contract with an uncapped liability provision | Duplicate | Counsel | 6 | Answered by the memo at 3.6 |
| Status | Count | What it means to the analyst |
|---|---|---|
| Sent | 61 | Uploaded against their number. Nothing to say about it |
| Sent with a memo | 8 | Present and correct, and reads oddly without half a page |
| Never applied | 9 | Closes on receipt. One clause of reason each |
| Should exist, missing | 4 | A finding. Owner and date per row |
| Duplicate within their own list | 2 | Cross-referenced, never uploaded twice |
| Total | 84 | 61 + 8 + 9 + 4 + 2 |
Thirteen of the eighty-four would have been blank on a first pass: the nine that never applied and the four that are real. Writing one line of reason on the nine took an afternoon and moved the investor's outstanding list from thirteen items to four. As an empty cell those two groups are identical, and as answers they are opposite: one is a fact about the company's stage, the other about its records.