River
Y CombinatorBacked by Y Combinator
FREE TEMPLATE

Community Building Strategy Template

Three documents and three sheets that turn real engagement data into a ranked tier list, catching the rare low-post member whose referrals alone earn Champion status.

Free download  ·  No account needed

Member Register

Before Any Member Has Been Scored

Every community member's trailing 90-day activity, before a tier has been computed or a referral checked.

CompanyContactActivity ScoreReferralsTier

A tier is computed from real posts, replies, and event attendance, then checked against closed referrals before it is finalized.

Amsell Analytics runs a 64-member customer community for operations and supply chain teams. Its own numbers echo a pattern Nielsen Norman Group has documented across online communities for two decades: roughly 90% lurk, 9% contribute occasionally, and 1% account for almost all the activity. Amsell's community skews further still: 4 members, 6.25% of the total, generated 87 of the community's 106 measured contribution points in the trailing 90 days, 82.1% of everything that happened. 51 members, 79.7% of the roster, posted, replied, or attended nothing at all.

Sorting by raw activity alone still misses the member worth the most. Tobias Kirkwood, Ravensdale Logistics' director of operations, posted once and replied once in the window, a score of 2 that alone ranks him below nine more active Contributors. He also referred two paying customers. Because a closed referral is a rarer, more commercially direct signal than another reply, it overrides the raw score outright instead of adding to it. That moves Kirkwood straight to Champion, regardless of how quiet his posting history looks next to it.

A community that only produces pleasant chatter is an audience wearing a community's name. Once the four Champions are named, they become the standing list for an ambassador program, a co-hosted AMA, or a case-study ask, the same well a webinar programme or a field and dinner event draws its warmest invitations from. The 51 Lurkers are not a problem the Programming Calendar tries to fix by pushing everyone to post. A low-friction poll keeps them reacting instead, and the reaction counts tell a moderator the quiet majority is still present rather than gone.

The tier that comes from real activity, and the override that catches revenue a leaderboard would miss

The Member Register, Activity Metrics, and Champion Identification sheets from the pack.

Member Register

64 members scored on trailing 90-day activity; 7 of the 64 shown here.

CompanyContactScoreTier
Fennwick RoboticsPriya Ondaatje52Champion
Oakmoor SystemsMarcus D.-Whitfield25Champion
Bellhaven TradersSana Okafor8Champion
Ravensdale LogisticsTobias Kirkwood2 (+2 ref.)Champion
Corriston FoodsInes Marchetti4Contributor
Thistlebrook RetailDeclan Ashworth3Contributor
Amberfield GroupPetra Kirkwood0Lurker

The other 50 Lurkers and 7 Contributors follow the same pattern. Only Tobias Kirkwood's Champion tier comes from the referral override rather than the raw score.

Activity Metrics

The raw counts behind the register above, same 7 members, trailing 90 days.

ContactPostsRepliesEventsReferralsReactions
Priya Ondaatje18313124
Marcus D.-Whitfield9142024
Sana Okafor431018
Tobias Kirkwood110212
Ines Marchetti22003
Declan Ashworth12006
Petra Kirkwood00003

Lurkers gave 183 of the community's 291 reactions this window, 62.9%, while posting zero times between them.

Champion Identification

All 4 Champions from the register, with what they did and why it matters.

ContactCompanyWhat They DidWhy a Champion
Priya OndaatjeFennwick Robotics18 posts, 31 replies, 3/3 eventsCategory leader; others cite her threads by name
Marcus D.-WhitfieldOakmoor Systems9 posts, 14 replies, 2/3 eventsOnly VP posting technical detail, not asking for a call
Sana OkaforBellhaven Traders4 posts, 3 replies, 1/3 eventsFirst reply on pricing questions from newer members
Tobias KirkwoodRavensdale Logistics1 post, 1 reply, 2 referralsRaw score alone reads Contributor; referrals make him Champion

Three of four Champions lead on raw activity. The fourth qualifies through the referral override alone.

What's in the pack

01

Community Charter

Defining who can join, the three engagement tiers, and the ground rules that keep vendor pitches and competitor bashing out of the space.

02

Programming Calendar

A recurring cadence, monthly AMA, biweekly prompt, quarterly spotlight, plus the low-friction poll that gives a Lurker something to click.

03

Moderation Guidance

Built around real cases: a public complaint, a competitor's employee posting, an off-topic pitch, each with a response-time target and an escalation path.

04

Member Register

Scores every member's trailing 90-day posts, replies, and event attendance into a Lurker, Contributor, or Champion tier, with the referral override recorded next to the raw score.

05

Activity Metrics

The raw per-member counts behind every tier, including reactions given, so a Lurker's real presence shows up even at zero posts.

06

Champion Identification

Names what each Champion actually did, why it matters, and the one recommended action: ambassador invite, case-study ask, or moderator role.

How to use it

  1. 1

    Send your activity export

    Send your community platform's activity export for the trailing 90 days, posts, replies, and event attendance per member, plus any closed referrals your CRM has tied to a member's name.

  2. 2

    River scores and overrides

    River sums each member's raw contribution score, assigns the naive tier, then checks referrals separately and overrides any member with a closed referral straight to Champion.

  3. 3

    Act on the Champion list

    Champion Identification turns the resulting short list into specific next actions, an ambassador invitation, a case-study ask, a co-hosted session, drafted in that member's own context.

  4. 4

    Rescore on a rolling basis

    A tier describes the last 90 days, not a member's whole tenure, so the Programming Calendar and Member Register both stay current as real activity shifts.

Frequently asked questions

Is this template free?

Yes, and the download is the whole thing, every document and sheet, with no signup and no card. Edit with AI installs it as a private workspace and replaces Amsell's worked example with your own community's activity. More packs sit in the template library.

What format are the downloaded files?

Three Word documents and three CSV sheets in one zip. The documents open in Word, Pages, or Google Docs, and the sheets open as real spreadsheets in Excel, Numbers, or Google Sheets, so the tiers and activity counts stay usable data rather than a table flattened onto a page.

How is this different from a community engagement plan?

A community engagement plan sets goals like raising monthly active members and lists tactics for hitting them. It does not compute a tier from any individual member's real activity, and it has no mechanism for a member who barely posts but referred a paying customer. This scores every member from measured data and overrides the score itself when a referral outranks it.

What if we have no activity data yet?

Say so, and score whatever rough count already exists, even a moderator's informal tally, rather than waiting for a perfect export. Note plainly which counts are estimated so they can be replaced once a real export exists, the same way Amsell's own first quarter running this process would have started.

How do you decide who counts as a Champion?

Sum posts, replies, and event attendance over the trailing 90 days; five or more makes a Champion, one to four a Contributor, zero a Lurker. Then check referrals separately: a member with at least one closed referral in the window becomes a Champion regardless of that raw score, since a referral is a rarer and more valuable signal than another reply.

How does this connect to our event or webinar programme?

They are deliberately separate. The event and conference pack and field and dinner event pack get the right people into a room once. This pack keeps them engaged in between, and a Champion identified here is often the first person worth inviting to co-host the next one.

Find the members actually worth building around

Send your community platform's activity export and whatever referral data your CRM has. River scores every member's real engagement, overrides for referral impact, and names your Champions.

Edit with AI