Every backlink audit template scores referring domains by toxicity and implies the fix is obvious: disavow anything above the line. Semrush's own scale runs 0 to 100, with 60 and above marked toxic. Google's disavow documentation says the opposite: in most cases Google can assess which links to trust without help, so most sites will never need the tool. Disavowing is warranted only alongside an actual manual action, not a third-party score.
On this pack's own worked pull, Corvine Analytics's 587 referring domains split into 498 non-toxic, 68 potentially toxic, and 21 scoring toxic under Semrush's own bands. Manual review of those 21 found 14 with a private-link-network signature and 2 carrying keyword-stuffed anchors from a discontinued 2019 campaign, both worth a removal request. The other 5 were ordinary sites having a bad month, a broken page or a ranking drop of their own, with nothing to disavow. Search Console showed no manual action on file, so nothing here got disavowed regardless of score.
Link Register tiers every domain by relevance and authority rather than by score alone. Prospect List works the other direction: it diffs two named competitors' referring domains against this site's own, then reads each candidate's page for why they would actually link, a stale statistic, a missing roundup entry, a broken outbound link. Pair it with the competitor content gap for what to write next, the internal linking review for the equity already sitting inside your own site, and the local listing audit for the directory side of the same authority question.